Philippe Pulice presents 2076 as a dystopian anticipation novel used to dramatize what he sees as the continued spread and institutionalization of wokism, radical ecology, anti-speciesism, and identity-based ideas. He argues that these currents are already embedded in institutions, media, and education, and says the book’s analysis chapters show the novel is an extrapolation rather than pure invention.
Watch on YouTube ›Get the market thesis, key claims, assets, contradictions, and follow-up questions from any financial video — then unlock a version personalized to your portfolio, watchlist, and favorite speakers.
Philippe Pulice’s core thesis is that his new book, 2076, is a dystopian forecast of where current ideological trends could lead if they continue unchecked. He frames it as 90% fiction and 10% short analytical chapters, deliberately pairing a story with concrete examples to argue that the book is not “delirious” but an extrapolation of real phenomena. The speaker says he wanted a lighter, more accessible format than a traditional essay, so the reader experiences the social consequences through a protagonist rather than being lectured. A major part of the argument is that wokism is not fading; instead, it has mutated, become more entrenched, and in Europe has even been institutionalized. He claims Trump’s anti-woke decrees in the U.S. produced a backlash: anti-woke people became more anti-woke, woke activists became more woke, and some undecided people came to see wokists as victims. …
Immediate setup is promotional and rhetorical rather than tradable: the book launch is the catalyst, and the pitch is that readers should treat current culture-war topics as live risks, not dead issues. Near term, the main risk is overreading the dystopian framing as evidence rather than scenario-building.
Over the next few months, the base case in his view is continued normalization of woke-adjacent ideas in institutions, education, and media, with backlash producing polarization rather than resolution. What would change the view is a sustained, broad rollback of these norms instead of the current mutation-and-entrenchment pattern.
The structural thesis is that cultural institutions can steadily reclassify controversial ideas as normal, and that this regime shift is harder to reverse once embedded. Long term, the lasting implication is not one policy fight but a durable redefinition of social norms around identity, dissent, and legitimacy.
2076 is a roman d’anticipation meant to explore where current ideological trends could lead in 50 years.
He explicitly says the book is an anticipation novel about current trends pushed forward.
The book is 90% fiction and 10% short analytical chapters intended to show that the scenarios are grounded in real examples.
He repeatedly emphasizes the split between narrative and analysis.
Wokism has not ended; it has mutated and is stronger, especially in Europe where it has become institutionalized.
He says it is not dead, has mutated like a virus, and has been institutionalized.
À quoi ressemblera le monde de demain ? Peux-tu nous parler de ton livre 2076 ?
Philippe explains that 2076 is a dystopian anticipation novel, 90% fiction and 10% analytical chapters, through which he explores ideological currents like wokism, radical ecology, anti-speciesism, and the erasure of traditional cultural landmarks. He aims to make readers experience these ideas through the protagonist rather than reading a heavy essay, inviting reflection without forcing conclusions.
Est-ce que le wokisme pourrait arriver à bout en 2076 et provoquer une dislocation de notre société et de nos valeurs ?
Philippe argues that wokism is not dead but has mutated and strengthened, especially in Europe. He explains that Trump's crackdown in the US created a backlash that radicalized both sides and generated sympathy for woke individuals, while Europe positioned itself as a haven. Wokism has become institutionalized in France — for example through the EVARS school program teaching that biological sex and gender are distinct and unrelated.
Est-ce que tu parles aussi de l'alimentation de synthèse dans le livre ?
Philippe confirms he imagines a world where consuming steaks, pork chops, and sausages is frowned upon, and he envisions a convergence between the pharmaceutical and agri-food industries. He references Bill Gates and synthetic meat. These phenomena already exist but are underreported or unknown to the public, so the book aims to raise awareness while remaining playful.
Unlock the full claims, asset map, scores, related transcripts, follow-up questions, and AI chat — shaped around your portfolio, watchlist, favorite speakers, and risks.
