WARNING: Silver Market COLLAPSE Incoming? What You Need to Know Now!

This is an interviewer-led conversation with Glenn Jessum, president and CEO of Silver Tiger Metals, about silver, gold, energy prices, and the macro backdrop. The speaker argues that silver’s run to above $100 was driven by a major regime shift: the U.S. classifying silver as a critical mineral and China treating it as strategically sensitive with export controls. He frames silver as a geopolitical weapon between the U.S. and China, and says the long-running supply deficit matters more now because demand and strategic importance have changed. At the same time, he is tactically bearish on the immediate setup because of Middle East instability and higher oil prices. He expects markets to “flush,” liquidity to tighten, and gold and silver to fall further before bottoming. …

1. Immediate silver/gold weakness is framed as a liquidity and geopolitics-driven flush, not a broken long-term thesis.
2. The speaker sees silver as strategically important because of U.S.-China competition and supply deficits.
3. Higher oil prices are treated as stagflationary and supportive of a later precious-metals breakout, but painful first.
4. The Fed is described as boxed in: inflation pressure argues for hikes, recession risk argues for cuts.
5. The company pitch is a construction-stage silver mine story with financing, permitting, and first-pour milestones.
6. The interview mixes macro commentary with a promotional equity-development narrative.

• The claim that silver is now the most critical mineral in the world is asserted forcefully but not demonstrated with comparative evidence.
• The 1973 analogy is directionally interesting but may overfit a past regime with different inflation, policy, and supply conditions.
• He presents a strong near-term bearish call on metals while also leaning on a very bullish long-term thesis; the timing of the bottom is vague and not well specified.
• The claim that ‘nothing is going to stop’ the move lower is too categorical given the many possible policy and market responses.
• The video gives no hard data supporting the specific $120 peak or the $70 pullback mentioned at the start, so those price references are not independently substantiated in the transcript.