Live London-session day-trading stream focused on NASDAQ/NQ, oil, gold, and prop-firm talk. The speaker leaned bullish on NASDAQ overall but repeatedly said the intraday action was sideways and untradeable, leading to several forced losses on trend-following entries.
Watch on YouTube ›Get the market thesis, key claims, assets, contradictions, and follow-up questions from any financial video — then unlock a version personalized to your portfolio, watchlist, and favorite speakers.
This was a live, informal London-session trading stream hosted by Leo on Pasha IRL. The discussion centered on real-time price action in NQ/NASDAQ, oil, gold, SPY/QQQ/ES, plus some side conversation about UK politics and a prop-firm comparison spreadsheet the speaker is building with Pasha. Leo said his higher-timeframe bias on NASDAQ remained bullish, but he repeatedly emphasized that the immediate market structure was choppy, sideways, and poor for EMA/trend-following setups. A large portion of the stream was spent analyzing whether NQ would retrace, break higher, or continue ranging. Leo described his preferred method as trading rejection off the 21 EMA on the 1m/2m/5m when the trend is confirmed, but he explicitly warned that this method fails in sideways markets. …
Near term, NQ looks like a messy range where trend-following entries are vulnerable to stopouts until price resolves out of consolidation. The immediate risk is chasing EMA signals in chop; the practical play is waiting for a clean sweep/reclaim or a true breakout.
Over the next few weeks, the bullish NASDAQ view only matters if the market starts producing cleaner directional legs and pullbacks that hold. If the tape stays rotational, the strategy should shift away from 21 EMA continuation and toward more selective regime-based trading.
Structurally, the stream argues that trading success depends more on identifying regime than on any single indicator. The durable lesson is that trend systems can be strong in impulse phases but get structurally broken by sideways markets, regardless of the trader’s broader bias.
Leo’s higher-timeframe bias on NASDAQ/NQ is bullish.
He explicitly said 'overall I am bullish' and repeated that overall he was bullish on NASDAQ.
The immediate intraday setup is sideways and poor for trend-following entries.
He repeatedly called the tape sideways, untradeable, and said EMA signals fail in such conditions.
Rejection off the 21 EMA on lower timeframes is his most reliable trading method in trending markets.
He described this as his preferred strategy and said it works well when a trend is confirmed.
What's your bias for the session?
Leo said he needed to watch the charts first and did not have an immediate bias yet.
Are you bullish on NASDAQ?
He said he was bullish overall, but not necessarily on the current intraday setup.
What are your most reliable trading methods?
He said his preferred approach is trading rejection off the 21 EMA in a confirmed trend on lower timeframes, but it should not be used in chop.
Unlock the full claims, asset map, scores, related transcripts, follow-up questions, and AI chat — shaped around your portfolio, watchlist, favorite speakers, and risks.