John Avlon’s final Bulwark episode is an interview about Ry Barcott’s book Courage Can Save Us and the broader case that courage, service, and bipartisan trust are scarce but necessary in U.S. politics. The conversation links military service, national service, and civic education to the health of Congress, arguing that polarization and partisan incentives punish cross-party problem solving.
Watch on YouTube ›Get the market thesis, key claims, assets, contradictions, and follow-up questions from any financial video — then unlock a version personalized to your portfolio, watchlist, and favorite speakers.
This episode is structured as a farewell from John Avlon and a long interview with Ry Barcott about Barcott’s new book, Courage Can Save Us. Avlon opens by saying he is wrapping up his two-year run on The Bulwark feed, but the show will continue with a new partner. He frames the episode as fitting for a closing chapter because it centers on courage, service, and the kind of civic leadership he has tried to spotlight across the show. Barcott says the book grew out of his work co-founding With Honor roughly eight years ago to help address polarization in Congress by supporting veterans and service-minded candidates. He says he selected five Republicans and five Democrats who are current officeholders and whose careers reveal moments of moral courage, often defined as choosing to serve something larger than oneself despite personal or political risk. …
Near term, the actionable setup is institutional friction: expect more headlines around unilateral foreign policy moves, congressional pushback, and partisan signaling rather than a clean policy consensus. Tactical risk rises if executive actions in Iran or elsewhere escalate faster than Congress can respond.
Over the next few months, the base case is continued polarization unless a small bipartisan service-oriented bloc can keep proving that cross-party governance is still possible. Validation would come from durable cooperation on Ukraine, national service, or war-powers constraints; invalidation would be further collapse into pure tribal positioning.
The long-run thesis is structural: America either rebuilds a culture of service that rewards courage and shared civic identity, or it continues drifting into a regime where partisanship and executive unilateralism dominate. The deeper implication is that democratic health depends as much on social norms of service as on formal institutions.
Expanding voluntary national service (like AmeriCorps) could be a bipartisan solution to the crisis of purpose and technology displacement facing young Americans.
The speaker argues national service is an '80/20 issue' with broad bipartisan support, is inexpensive (~$1B vs $1T defense budget), builds skills, and becomes more relevant as AI disrupts the job market.
The Republican Party has reversed its position on standing up to Russian aggression, abandoning the Reagan Republican stance on America's role in the world.
The speaker references Don Bacon and Brian Fitzpatrick as exceptions, noting most Republicans privately acknowledge the Russian threat but lack public courage due to rising populism.
Ukraine has gained a technological advantage over Russia in the last six months that is neutralizing Russia's numerical military advantage.
The speaker cites Ukrainian battlefield developments as 'absolutely remarkable', suggesting drone/tech superiority is offsetting Russia's larger force.
Why did you decide to write this book now?
He says he co-founded With Honor about eight years ago to help address polarization, especially in Congress, by supporting veterans and service-minded candidates. He also wanted to document this moment for younger Americans and highlight people he sees as showing real courage in public life.
What connects the people you chose to profile?
He says the unifying thread is courage: moral courage, a willingness to risk reputation or integrity to stand for something unpopular and take the consequences. He argues that service is the deeper basis for that courage and for the sense of national cohesion it can create.
How does the fact that these members are still in office affect the book?
He explains that writing about sitting elected officials gives the book a live view into the current moment, but it also makes accuracy more difficult because he has to portray people who are still actively serving. He says he tries to focus on the moments when they stepped up rather than on their imperfections.
Unlock the full claims, asset map, scores, related transcripts, follow-up questions, and AI chat — shaped around your portfolio, watchlist, favorite speakers, and risks.